Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G71 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 5, having an 82.9 score against 79.3. The Moto G71 5G design is much newer than the Galaxy Note 5's, although it is a bit thicker and a little heavier. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G71 5G has 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, so it provides some additional features.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a sharper display than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better pixel count per inch of screen. Moto G71 5G features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto G71 5G has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage. The Motorola Moto G71 5G features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Moto G71 5G captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G71 5G also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back, better video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.