Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than the Moto G71 5G, having a score of 89 against 82.9. Galaxy Note10's body is just a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Moto G71 5G, even though it was released 2 years before. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a screen that's very similar to Moto G71 5G's display, although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, a just a little less pixels per inch in the display and a little smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note10 features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Moto G71 5G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size. Motorola Moto G71 5G takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.