Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is just a bit better than the Moto G71 5G, having an 88.3 score against 82.9. Samsung Galaxy S10's body is lighter and just a bit thinner than the Moto G71 5G, although it was released 3 years before. Both phones we are comparing here include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better performance than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 has a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a higher screen pixel density.
Moto G71 5G captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G71 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G71 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.