Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is slightly better than Moto G71 5G's 82.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy S10e is an notably older device than Moto G71 5G, but Samsung managed to build it a little thinner and lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little better hardware performance than Moto G71 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy S10e has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2280px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Moto G71 5G takes slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Moto G71 5G also counts with a way more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy S10e features a very superior storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S10e also has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G71 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.