Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is better than the Moto G71 5G's 82.9 score. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version while Moto G71 5G has Android 11 version. Although the Samsung Galaxy S20 is older than the Moto G71 5G, it's design is a bit lighter and a little thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit faster CPU than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Galaxy S20 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a much better video quality. The Galaxy S20 counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G71 5G counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.