Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than the Moto G71 5G's overall score of 82.9. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a a bit heavier device than the Moto G71 5G, but both of them are 0.33inches thick. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better looking display than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G71 5G. They have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G71 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
The Moto G71 5G has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G71 5G also has a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.