Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Moto G71 5G, getting a 98 score against 82.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better phone than Moto G71 5G, it must be noted that it's also older, somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Moto G71 5G has Android 11, giving a lot of extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a little bit bigger display and a just a little higher pixels density. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera and a much higher video quality.
The Motorola Moto G71 5G and the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G have incredibly similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.