Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than Moto G71 5G, getting a score of 93.4 against 82.9. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and Moto G71 5G has Android 11. Even though the Galaxy S22 and the Moto G71 5G were released only a couple months apart, the Galaxy S22 is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 has a much better looking screen than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better pixels number in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy S22 has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Moto G71 5G, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Galaxy S22 features a better camera than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and a 50 mega-pixels resolution camera, the Galaxy S22 also has a way higher video quality.
Motorola Moto G71 5G has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.