Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Motorola Moto G71 5G, getting a general score of 95.4 against 82.9. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing here, the Galaxy S22 Ultra is an a little thicker and noticeably heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto G71 5G. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Motorola Moto G71 5G has Android 11 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with an incredibly better display than Moto G71 5G, because it has a quite bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the Moto G71 5G one, both of them have the same internal memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little faster CPU than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a battery duration that is just as good as Moto G71 5G's battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a greater camera than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.