Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-11-18 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G71 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, with an 82.9 score against 78.1. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto G71 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although the Motorola Moto G71 5G is newer than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, it is just a little bit thicker and heavier.
Galaxy S7 edge features a little bit better looking screen than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Motorola Moto G71 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4 more processing cores and more RAM memory.
The Moto G71 5G has a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Moto G71 5G features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Moto G71 5G captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light captures, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G71 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.