Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G71 5G is a bit better than the Galaxy S8 Active, with an 82.9 score against 81.9. Moto G71 5G's construction is notably newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy S8 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active and Moto G71 5G both feature really similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S8 Active features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with just a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Moto G71 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G71 5G also counts with higher video frame rate and a way more megapixels back camera. The Moto G71 5G has longer battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.