Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is slightly better than Moto G71 5G's 82.9 global score. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Moto G71 5G has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features. Although Galaxy Z Flip is older and a little heavier than Moto G71 5G, it's design is still somewhat thinner.
Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because it has a little bit better pixels number per inch in the display, a quite larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto G71 5G has a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same 1920x1080 video quality and a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also has a much higher resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy Z Flip features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto G71 5G has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.