Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than Motorola Moto G71 5G's global score of 82.9. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide you all the same OS features. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an older and a little heavier phone than the Motorola Moto G71 5G, but Samsung could make it somewhat thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because it has a quite bigger display, a just a little greater pixel quantity in each display inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G71 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better processing unit than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G71 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also has a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Moto G71 5G has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.