Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Moto G71 5G, having a global score of 94.6 against 82.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is somewhat thinner than the Moto G71 5G, but it is much heavier and was released around a year before. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a display that is just as good as the display in Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen and a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G71 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better processing power than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G71 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also has a much better resolution back camera.
Moto G71 5G features a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.