Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.67 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is slightly better than the Moto G71 5G's 82.9 general score. Both devices in this comparison use the same Android 11 operating system. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Moto G71 5G were only released 3 months apart, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is incredibly heavier but notably thinner than the Moto G71 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little better hardware performance than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G71 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto G71 5G has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G71 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G71 5G counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.