Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a little bit better than Moto G8 Plus, getting an 80.2 score against 77.6. Google Pixel's design is a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter than the Moto G8 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel features a bit better display than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G8 Plus counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Moto G8 Plus also has a greater number of cores (but slower).
Motorola Moto G8 Plus counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus also has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Moto G8 Plus counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 44 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.