Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G8 Plus is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a 77.6 score against 75.8. The Moto G8 Plus body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even when they were released only 0 months apart. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little faster processor than Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better camera than Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the same diafragm aperture and a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.