Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, with an 83.8 score against 77.6. The Galaxy A50 is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter device than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, even though both were released with only 7 months difference. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G8 Plus. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy A50 has a little more vivid display than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display and a little bigger display. Motorola Moto G8 Plus shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus also has a way larger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a way better (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A50 has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A50 and Motorola Moto G8 Plus count with incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.