Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the Moto G8 Plus's 77.6 general score. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than Moto G8 Plus, although both were released only 6 months apart. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a bit bigger screen, a bit greater screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy A51 5G features a little bit better performance than Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G8 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G's camera is just as good as the camera in Motorola Moto G8 Plus, and although the Galaxy A51 5G has a tinier camera aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size back-facing camera sensor and a camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G features a little longer battery performance than Moto G8 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.