Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Moto G8 Plus, having a 91.3 score against 77.6. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Moto G8 Plus, but it is also just a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bit larger screen and a just a little higher display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A52 5G takes just a bit better videos and photos than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.