Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G8 Plus, with a overall score of 79.5 against 77.6. The Galaxy Note7 design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto G8 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The Galaxy Note7 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Motorola Moto G8 Plus features a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G8 Plus has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto G8 Plus also has a larger number of cores (but slower).
The Moto G8 Plus features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 14% more battery size. The Moto G8 Plus captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same aperture and the same video frame rate, the Moto G8 Plus also has a bigger camera sensor and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.