Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is way better than Moto G8 Plus, with a score of 93.6 against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's construction is somewhat thinner but just a little bit heavier than Moto G8 Plus, and they were released with only a few months difference. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a higher display density.
Galaxy S10 5G has more memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity. The Moto G8 Plus features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G8 Plus also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.