Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G8 Plus's 77.6 general score. Even though the Galaxy S10e and the Motorola Moto G8 Plus were released with only a couple months difference, the Galaxy S10e is somewhat thinner and lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little bit better looking screen than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2280px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy S10e features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light environments and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus also counts with a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Motorola Moto G8 Plus features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.