Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a global score of 94.8, which is a lot better than Moto G8 Plus's general score of 77.6. Galaxy S20 is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter phone than Moto G8 Plus, even though both were released with only 4 months difference. The Galaxy S20 has a better screen than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a higher screen density.
The Galaxy S20 features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G8 Plus captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light images and video, a much more megapixels back camera and faster 30 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy S20 has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G8 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20's battery performance is very similar to Motorola Moto G8 Plus's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.