Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, having a score of 90.8 against 77.6. Even though Galaxy S20 FE is a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G8 Plus, it's a little thinner and also newer. The Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit better looking screen than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a quite larger screen and a little better quantity of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Moto G8 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto G8 Plus shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and video and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.