Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, getting a 98 score against 77.6. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the Motorola Moto G8 Plus were only released 4 months apart, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is heavier but a bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G8 Plus. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because it has a greater pixel count per inch of display, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little larger screen. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same sensor size, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way higher resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with better battery performance than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.