Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 400 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Plus's global score of 77.6. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also a notably thicker and incredibly heavier phone. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G8 Plus. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better screen than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has as much storage capacity for games and applications as the Moto G8 Plus one, both have a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB and exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior battery life than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Moto G8 Plus has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.