Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Plus's global score of 77.6. Galaxy XCover Pro's design is heavier and a little thicker than Motorola Moto G8 Plus. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Moto G8 Plus. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better screen than Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a just a little greater screen density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Moto G8 Plus shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Moto G8 Plus also has a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a way better video definition and a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy XCover Pro's storage for games and applications is just as good as Moto G8 Plus's one, they have a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB and exactly the same 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.