Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G8 Plus's 77.6 general score. Even when the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Motorola Moto G8 Plus were released with only a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is way thinner and just a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit sharper screen than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a little bit greater pixels density, a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bigger display. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Moto G8 Plus counts with longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Moto G8 Plus has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G8 Plus also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution, a bigger camera aperture and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.