Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Moto G8 Plus, with a 92.3 score against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is newer, a little bit lighter and much thinner than Moto G8 Plus. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite better pixels density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G8 Plus counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images, a lot more megapixels back camera and a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Moto G8 Plus counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.