Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Cosmic blue and Crystal pink | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 14.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G8 Plus's 77.6 overall score. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot heavier than the Motorola Moto G8 Plus, it's noticeably thinner and also newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little faster CPU than Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better looking display than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a little bit worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a higher 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution and a bigger screen. Moto G8 Plus captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a lower image quality and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G8 Plus also counts with a camera with way more MP and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.