Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is better than the Moto G8 Power Lite, having an 88.1 score against 74.3. IPhone X is an way older cellphone than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but Apple could make it somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. The iPhone X counts with a lot better looking screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and way more pixels per inch of screen.
The iPhone X features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone X captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a way better video definition.
The iPhone X counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Moto G8 Power Lite features a very superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has an 84% more battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.