Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is better than the Moto G8 Power Lite, having an 82 score against 74.3. The Apple iPhone XR construction is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than Moto G8 Power Lite, although it was released about a year before. The iPhone XR has a better display than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 828 x 1792px resolution and a just a little better pixels density.
The Apple iPhone XR has a quite better processing power than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 256 GB.
Apple iPhone XR shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a much less megapixels camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality. Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 70% greater battery size.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.