Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the Moto G8 Power Lite's overall score of 74.3. The Google Pixel body is noticeably lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Moto G8 Power Lite, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Google Pixel has a better screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1080 x 1920.
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with just a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB. Moto G8 Power Lite has a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G8 Power Lite also has more processing cores.
Google Pixel features a slightly better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Google Pixel also counts with a way better video resolution. Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has an 81 percent more battery size.
Google Pixel costs exactly the same than Moto G8 Power Lite.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.