Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, having a general score of 80 against 74.3. Google Pixel 3 is an older cellphone than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, but Google was able to make it thinner and lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 3 features a brighter screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2160 resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 features a little better performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. Google Pixel 3 has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot better video resolution.
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Moto G8 Power Lite has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.