Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is a bit better than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, getting a global score of 80.7 against 74.3. Even though Google Pixel 3 XL is older than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, it's design is just a little lighter and thinner. Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a more vivid display than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a way higher screen pixels density. The Google Pixel 3 XL takes a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images.
Moto G8 Power Lite features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G8 Power Lite also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.