Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a score of 78.8, which is a bit better than Moto G8 Power Lite's global score of 74.3. The Google Pixel 3a is an older device than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but Google managed to make it noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a has an older 11 version while Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Moto G8 Power Lite has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3a. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3a has a better display than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2220px.
The Google Pixel 3a takes a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture. Moto G8 Power Lite features a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto G8 Power Lite also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Google Pixel 3a not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.