Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than the Moto G8 Power Lite, with a global score of 82.9 against 74.3. Even when Google Pixel 4 XL and the Moto G8 Power Lite were released with only a couple of months difference, Google Pixel 4 XL is thinner and a little lighter. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a lot better looking screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher amount of pixels per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040.
Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Moto G8 Power Lite has better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a lot worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
The Google Pixel 4 XL costs a lot more than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.