Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is better than Moto G8 Power Lite, having an 82.9 score against 74.3. The Google Pixel 4a design is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G8 Power Lite, even though both were released only 4 months apart. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie.
Google Pixel 4a has a much better display than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much higher pixels count per screen inch. The Google Pixel 4a has a processing unit that's just as good as the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite one, and although the Google Pixel 4a has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 4a shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a much less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture. Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB.
Moto G8 Power Lite has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59 percent larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a is more expensive than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.