Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is better than Moto G8 Power Lite's 74.3 overall score. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than the Moto G8 Power Lite, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better display pixels density and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a little better performance than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G8 Power Lite features slightly more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Moto G8 Power Lite counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29 percent more battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.