Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Moto G8 Power Lite's general score of 74.3. Google Pixel 5's design is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than Moto G8 Power Lite, although both of them were only released 6 months apart. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 has a sharper screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a lot greater screen pixel density. Moto G8 Power Lite features a slightly better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite features improved battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23% larger battery size. The Google Pixel 5 shoots better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a much lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light images and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Google Pixel 5 is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.