Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's general score of 74.3. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is older than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, it's body is thinner and noticeably lighter. LG V35 ThinQ features a way better looking display than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater pixels amount per inch of display and a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto G8 Power Lite features a way better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a way higher video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.