Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, having an 87.1 score against 74.3. LG Velvet's design is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, even though both were released with only 1 months difference. LG Velvet features a brighter screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a higher pixels density, a bit larger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The LG Velvet features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G8 Power Lite has better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. LG Velvet features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a much better (4K) video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG Velvet is also the cheapest, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.