Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than the Moto G8 Power Lite, with a score of 83.8 against 74.3. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older phone than Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy A50's CPU is just as good as Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's CPU, both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Moto G8 Power Lite has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A50 takes better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a back camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.