Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is better than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, having a score of 86.6 against 74.3. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Galaxy A50s and the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite were only released 6 months apart, the Galaxy A50s is lighter and somewhat thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A50s counts with a sharper screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Galaxy A50s has a lot better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A50s also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more MP. Galaxy A50s counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G8 Power Lite has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.