Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, with an 85.5 score against 74.3. Galaxy A51's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, even when both were released with only 4 months difference. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy A51 counts with a more vivid display than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy A51 also has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite and the Galaxy A51 feature similar processing units, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A51 has a much better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A51 also has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way better video definition.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Galaxy A51 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.