Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's 74.3 general score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A51 5G's construction is a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, even though both of them were released with only 0 months difference.
The Moto G8 Power Lite and the Galaxy A51 5G count with similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A51 5G has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy A51 5G has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy A51 5G also has more pixels per inch of screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy A51 5G takes greater pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Galaxy A51 5G has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory.
The Moto G8 Power Lite has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G is a bit more expensive than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.