Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the Moto G8 Power Lite, having a 91.3 score against 74.3. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is newer, just a little lighter and a little thinner than Moto G8 Power Lite. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version while Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a better screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a better pixel density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Moto G8 Power Lite, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a back camera with lot more MP and a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.