Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a global score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than Moto G8 Power Lite's score of 74.3. The Galaxy A70 construction is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than the Moto G8 Power Lite, despite of the fact that it was released a little bit over a year before. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A70 features a slightly better screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a little larger display, a lot better 1080 x 2400px resolution and more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A70, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity. The Moto G8 Power Lite features a much better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations, they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition.
The Galaxy A70 costs exactly the same than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.