Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than the Moto G8 Power Lite, with a 92.9 score against 74.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even when the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and the Moto G8 Power Lite were released only 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better processor than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a sharper display than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a quite bigger display, a better pixel count per inch of screen and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited environments, a way higher video quality and a back camera with a much higher resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features much more storage to store more games and applications than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than Moto G8 Power Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.